Saturday, April 26, 2008

What Hop Shortage?

For most of my brewing the hop shortage isn't too big of a deal, when you are only using .5-1 oz of hops in a batch it just doesn't effect you that much. Luckily when I heard that the shortage might be coming last fall I stocked up on hops from Fresh Hops and Hops Direct, as a result I decided to be a bit wasteful and do an IPA at the end of March.

This recipe is a bit strange in that it had no hops in the boil. I added hops at just about every other stage though, to the mash and sparge, first wort, flameout, and dry hop. Normally first wort hops are added as the wort first runs out of the mash tun and into the boil kettle, and they are left in until the end of the boil. What I did was to add them in a muslin bag and then pull them out with tongs at the first sign of the boil. What is the point of all this? The huge amount of hops in the boil for most American IPAs can lend a bit of a vegetal flavor to my palate. By adding hops early the alpha acids are extracted before the boil, and then isomerized by the boil after the hops have been removed.

This was also only the second time I have fined a beer with gelatin. It was amazing how quickly the beer went from murky to brilliant, just 24 hours at 45 degrees. According to Vinnie from Russian River the more yeast you are able to get out of suspension before adding the dry hops the more contact they will have with the beer and thus the more effective they will be. Here is a great pdf from Vinnie on Brew-Monkey where he outlines 10 tips on how to brew better hoppy beers.

The malt bill is pretty simple, mostly Golden Promise, with a bit of malted wheat and carapils. I intended to buy "regular" carapils which is very light, around 2L, but instead I accidentally bought Munton's Carapils which is 20L. This mix up isn't a big deal, the beer is still very light in color and sweetness. For hops I used all whole hops, Amarillo and Simcoe, I find them both to be very smooth which further enhances the drinkability I was looking for.

Hoppopotamus

Recipe Specifics
----------------
Batch Size (Gal): 3.80
Total Grain (Lbs): 10.09
Anticipated OG: 1.064
Anticipated SRM: 6.6
Anticipated IBU: 72.3
Brewhouse Efficiency: 64 %
Wort Boil Time: 90 Minutes

Grain
----------------------
9.13 lbs. Golden Promise
0.56 lbs. Wheat Malt
0.41 lbs. CaraPils (20L Version)

Hops
-----
0.50 oz. Amarillo Mash Hop
0.50 oz. Amarillo Sparge Hop
1.00 oz. Amarillo First Wort Hop
1.00 oz. Amarillo Flameout
0.50 oz. Simcoe Flame0ut
1.00 oz. Amarillo Dry Hop
0.50 oz. Simcoe Dry Hop

Extras
-------
0.50 Tsp Yeast Nutrient @ 15 Min.
0.05 Oz Irish Moss @15 Min.

Yeast
------
WYeast 1056 American Ale/Chico

Mash Schedule
---------------
60 Min. @ 151

Notes
------
Brewed 3/29/08 by myself

2 g gypsum added to filtered DC water for the mash, same for the batch sparge.

Collected 6 gallons of 1.044 wort. Took the first wort hops out just as the beer started to boil.

Dissolved/hydrated the nutrient and .5 tsp of irish moss in water before adding it to the boil.

Gave the beer 45 seconds of oxygen. Pitched half of the starter I made for this and the Smoked Porter.

Set freezer to 62 to keep the fermentation temperature in check. Fermentation was active by the next morning.

4/02/08 Upped temperature to 67 to help the fermentation finish off.

4/04/08 Still has a nice thick krausen, only down to 1.020. Hopefully will drop another 6-10 points before it is finished. Solid moderate bitterness and a great hop flavor.

4/10/08 Fermentation seems to be over, dropped temp to 50 in preparation for adding gelatin.

4/11/07 Dissolved a packet of Knox gelatin in 1/4 cup of cold water, then mixed in 1/4 cup of boiling water. Added it to the beer and stirred/swirled gently to distribute, then chilled to 45 in the freezer to encourage precipitation of the yeast. Within 12 hours the beer was noticeably clearer.

4/12/08 Transferred to secondary and added a marble-weighted hop sock with the dry hops. raised temp to 60 to promote aroma extraction.

4/16/08 Gravity down to 1.012 (81% AA, 6.9% ABV) Bitterness is solid, but not as strong as it could be, however the hop flavor and aroma are terrific.

4/19/08 Bottled with 2.25 oz of table sugar, and added back a bit of 1056 yeast slurry to ensure carbonation. Aiming for 2.4 volumes of CO2

5/10/08 Scored a disappointing 26 at the SoFB, but I think it turned out as a very hoppy/drinkable IPA. The main complaint from the judges is that it isn't hoppy enough, and that the hops that are there aren't right for an IPA.

5/12/08 Tasted as part of the Alternative Hopping Basic Brewing Radio Episode.

Sunday, April 20, 2008

Does most of your homebrew get kegged or bottled?

90% or more Kegged - 47 (36%)

90% or more Bottled - 72 (55%)

Somewhere in between - 11 (8%)

Looks like most people are in the mostly bottling camp with me. I bottle everything, some day I'm sure I'll get a kegging setup, but I like the flexibility of bottling enough that I will always bottle many of my beers.

Things I like about bottling: Allows me to have a huge variety on beers on hand, it's cheap and simple, they are easy to transport, and it is easy to do small quantities for split batches.

Things I hate about bottling: Cleaning bottles, filling bottles, and the occasional problems that come from carbonating high alcohol beers.

Here are some pictures from a night last week taking the labels off about 5 cases of commercial bottles. I soaked the bottles in hot water and generic OxiClean for about an hour, then scraped off the labels with a knife, and took off the glue with a Brillo pad.


Sunday, April 13, 2008

Lambic Phone Home, Again

Last year about this time my mother took some pictures of the sour beers I had aging in my old room, this year she did it again.

In the photo above are the three sour beers I have aging in my parents' closet. From left to right you can see my Flanders Pale Ale (half of which will be bottled in August with the other half getting some fruit, probably Pluots ala Russian River Compunction), my Cable Car clone (my mother is graciously cleaning the airlock shortly), and my Lambic (which is going on two years old and will be partially bottled in August and have the rest blended with some fruit and give a few more months of age).

The photo below is a closeup on the pellicle reforming on the Lambic. You can see the bigger chunks that are remnants of the old pellicle which fell which I was transferring the carboy from one room to another.

Friday, April 11, 2008

Big Funky Beers

Recently I have had the pleasure of trying three fantastic beers which were both more than 10% ABV and influenced by Brett and/or bacteria. In each beer the microbes and barrel aging smoothed out the rough edges that often plague “big beers” and added unique flavors that really set them apart from their “clean” counterparts.

It started with De Dolle Oerbier Reserva 2006, a special version of their regular Oerbier aged in wine barrels with microflora that took it from its original ABV of 9 up to 13. The flavors are a spectacular balance of rich malts with cherry funk and subtle acidity.

Next came a taste of an experimental Brettanomyces inoculated version of Barrel Aged Millennium at Old Dominion. It tasted like Gale’s Prize Old Ale on steroids, huge malt backbone with an earthy old leather Brett character to die for. I will be very happy when this one eventually gets released as a packaged beer. I must say that from what I have seen Old Dominion is really stepping up their game since being bought out by Costal/Bud.

Finally came the massive Abbaye De Saint Bon-Chien 2005 from Swiss brewer BFM, the funk was not as strong as the other two, but the malt flavor and thick mouthfeel made it one of the best cold weather sipping beers I have had. At 15% ABV it is truly a massive beer unlike any other funky beer I have tried.

These three drinking experiences have done what all great beers should, inspire me to brew something similar. I have not figured out exactly what recipe I am going to go with, but I think it will be something like an Oud Bruin combined with an Old Ale and ramped up to 1.110 or so.

Now that the Roeselare Blend is back from Wyeast I will probably use that to do this beer, but only after growing it up a couple of generation or to shift the microbe balance more towards the lactic acid bacteria (which can reproduce faster than yeast). The Flanders Red I made by adding the blend to the secondary is very tasty and drinkable, but up against a beer like La Folie it doesn’t have nearly enough acidity. For a big beer it is even harder to get much sourness as the high level of sourness and proportionally increased hopping can inhibit the souring microbes.

At least one of the generations before the big sour beer will be another Flanders Red. Currently, my friend Scott and I are planning on brewing a couple batches of Flanders Red that we will eventually blend together. The idea is to age a few batches varying things like the oxygen permeability of the storage container, amount of oak, microbes, etc… Then after 12-18 months we will taste all of the batches and blend them accordingly.

Here is a draft of what I am considering fermenting with a second or third generation slurry of Wyeast's Roeselare Blend. The malt extract is just there to boost the gravity above what I can fit comfortably in my mash tun.

Big Funky

Recipe Specifics
----------------
Batch Size (Gal): 3.50
Total Grain (Lbs): 14.50
Anticipated OG: 1.150
Anticipated SRM: 23.5
Anticipated IBU: 28.2
Brewhouse Efficiency: 66 %
Wort Boil Time: 135 Minutes

Grain/Extract/Sugar
---------------------
6.00 lbs. Pilsener
2.50 lbs. Munich Malt
1.50 lbs. Generic DME - Light
1.00 lbs. CaraMunich Malt
1.00 lbs. CaraVienne Malt
1.00 lbs. Flaked Corn
.75 lbs. Dark Candi Syrup (D2)

.06 lbs. Chocolate Malt

Hops
-----
0.625 oz. Galena @ 90 min.

Yeast
-----
Yeast Cake from Flanders Red (US-05 and Red Poppy dregs)


Mash Schedule
-------------
90 Minutes at 150

Notes

-----
Brewed 6/15/08 with Mike and Brian

D2 Candi Syrup added at the start of sparge.

Collected 6 gallons of 1.057 wort, added extract while heating to a boil. 3.30 gallons of 1.120 wort post boil.

Chilled to 80 (took an hour due to warm tap water). Put into freezer at 60 degrees. Pitched yeast/funk cake from Flanders Red (US-05 and Red Poppy) after 5 hours in the fridge. This increased the volume and reduced the gravity slightly. Gave it a light shake to get O2 in, but not too much as there are loads of yeast cells, and Pedio hates O2.

Small krausen by 12 hours, large one by 24.

6/18/08 Fermentation began to slowdown so I upped the temperature to 62.

6/22/08 Still has a decent krausen, gravity only down to 1.065 (7.7% ABV, 47% AA). Upped temp to 65 to help the yeast keep moving.

6/24/08 Added the dregs from a bottle of Beatification 002.

7/04/08 Transferred to a 3 gallon glass carboy for secondary, down to ~1.040 (66% AA, 11% ABV).


8/20/08 The alcohol has mellowed considerably, but there are still almost no sour/funky flavors. This one still needs more time, hopefully the high ABV has just slowed the microbes down and not stopped them entirely.

10/02/08 Update, down to 1.020

12/21/08 Still 1.020, fermentation seems to be finished.

1/24/09 Has really picked up a nice lightly oxidized, dark fruit character since my last tasting. Still at 1.020, so I pitched some EC-1118 champagne yeast. I'll bottle this batch once the yeast has a chance to do what it wants, about a week.

1/31/09 Blended in 20 oz of La Folie (sacrilege I know) and 10 oz of my Temptation clone for sourness and to lighten it up a touch. Bottled with 1 5/8 oz of table sugar.

4/21/09 First Tasting, not carbed yet...


6/14/09 Still no carbonation, so I rehydrated a pack of Premier Cuvee from Red Star (14-16% ABV tolerance) in a 1/4 cup of warm/filtered water. Added a few drops to each bottle, then recapped. Hopefully the yeast will provide carbonation, but not eat any of the residual dextrins (which could lead to bottle bombs).

11/28/14 Opened the final bottle. Ever so faintly carbonated (all it needed). Very port-like, rich, somewhat sticky, mildly boozy. Great depth of flavor: brown sugar, plums, cocoa, subtle fruity Brett. Mildly acidic, but not really sour. Somewhere between an over-the-top English old ale and an over-the-top Flemish oud bruin. I'll have to brew something like this again!

Sunday, March 30, 2008

Blending for Competitions

Recently I have been trying to make a more concerted effort to enter the monthly style competitions my homebrew club runs. However, since I rarely brew to style it is hard to get a helpful critique of my brewing. So for the last two months I have been blending two off-style beers together to get something that is closer to the classic style. I simply chill the bottles I want to blend for 24 hours in the fridge (cold liquids hold CO2 better), then pout them into chilled wetted bottles (wetting reduces the nucleation sites), this seems to hold the carbonation pretty well, and oxidation isn't an issue since I'm doing it the night before they'll be consumed (like a growler fill, fine for a few days if kept cold).

In January I blended my Funky Old Ale with a Wee Heavy that I did with a couple of my friends as a parti-gyle brew day. The Wee heavy was about a year old and very sweet with an FG around 1.030. I went with a 2:1 ratio of Wee Heavy to Old Ale. I thought this blend mellowed out the funkiness to an acceptable level and added enough sweetness to make it a more friendly beer. It did alright with an average score of 29. The judges comments are very positive, for example one says "This old ale makes a firm impression of the style." However, clearly the hint of Brett confused two of them slightly, although neither of them identified it. One judge thought the beer was over-the-hill and oxidized, while another thought it had some acetaldehyde and would improve with some age. I think both of these were just a misidentification of the flavor/aroma Brettanomyces contributes. Overall I was pleased with the comments and the fact that I was one of the 4 beers that made it to the best in show table out of 16 beers, pretty good considering neither of the beers could have passed as an Old Ale on their own.

For February I blended my Scandinavian Imperial Porter and a second runnings "leftovers" porter I did with a few friends a couple months back. I entered it as a Baltic Porter, with a 2:1 ratio of regular porter to imperial. Again it did pretty well with an average score of 32. Some of the descriptors used include cherry, prune, chocolate, clean, and roasted. I got dinged for having low carbonation, which I expected because the Scandinavian Imperial Porter is pretty close to flat. The only really confusing comment is that it lacked complexity, and that I should "try more variety in the grain bill," each of the beers contained about 10 malts, probably the two most complex grain bills I have every used. I believe that blending two beers can either grow or destroy complexity, as I saw in my blended tasting subtle changes in the ratio can really change the flavor of the blend.

I wouldn't suggest this method for beers that will sit around for awhile before they are judged, the pouring does oxide the beer which will end up giving off flavors over time. You could certainly do taste tests though, blending a couple bottles and trying one every week or so to see how much of a problem oxidation would be.

My time of poking fun at judges will also be coming to an end soon as I'll be taking the BJCP exam in June. I am lucky that my club is running a prep class, it will be interested to see how much harder blind "flight" judging to style is than drinking something on its own and just determining if I like it or not.

Look for more of these blended reviews as time passes, it seems like a fun way to get something in a competition. This summer I will be doing a large pre-bottling blending of several sour beers that should have enough age on them, really looking forward to that.

How many batches of beer have you brewed?

How many batches of beer have you brewed?

0 11 (5%)

1-10 59 (29%)

11-30 57 (28%)

31-100 52 (25%)

100+ 23 (11%)


Looks like a good mix of experience levels.


The number of beers I've personally brewed is 67 if you count my split batches as only one beer. That's an average of a brew every 2.5 weeks since I started brewing , not too shabby. That doesn't include helping out on other people's brew days, or other fermented beverages. If you want to be generous and count each part of a split batch separately then the number of distinct beers I've made it is about 89.


In my experience the number of beers brewed or time as a brewer isn't an accurate gauge of brewing experience. I think the amount of time you spend researching, and thinking about each batch is just as important. If you are brewing a beer a week, but just using a recipe you found in a book or online without really understanding the why of each ingredient and step, how much are you really learning? If you put a lot of effort into making a beer, but don't take the time to write down what you've done, how much of the experience are you retaining? I'm guessing most of the people who read this blog like to read and think about beers, and half the reason I started this thing was to force myself to take better notes on brew days and tasting which I hope will make me a better brewer.